Changes

In polarity to [[alternative medicine]], which emphasizes separation, the term integrative medicine denotes exchange and collaboration of complementary ([[complementary medicine|complementary]]) partners. The term integrative medicine was applied in the late 1940s in Anglo-American literature<ref name=":2">{{Cite |first=Benno|last=Brinkhaus|first2=Tobias|last2=Esch |chapter=Was ist integrative Medizin? |trans-chapter=What is integrative medicine?|editor-first=Benno|editor-last=Brinkhaus|editor-first2=Tobias|editor-last2=Esch |title=Integrative Medicine and Health |publisher=Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft |location=Berlin |date=2021 |ISBN=978-3-95466-422-1 |pages=9}}</ref> and propagated since the 1990s by, among others, [[Andrew Weil]]<ref name=":1">{{Cite |first=Dieter |last=Melchart |title=From Complementary to Integrative Medicine and Health: Do We Need a Change in Nomenclature? |journal=Complement Med Res |number=25 |publisher=Karger |location=Freiburg |date=2018 |language=en |DOI=10.1159/000488623 |pages=76-78}}</ref>. In the German-speaking world, the term came into use only from the 1990s.<ref name=":2" /> The emphases and interpretations of the still relatively young term changed over the years and are weighted partly differently by different representatives even today. Below are some descriptions and definitions.

In polarity to [[alternative medicine]], which emphasizes separation, the term integrative medicine denotes exchange and collaboration of complementary ([[complementary medicine|complementary]]) partners. The term integrative medicine was applied in the late 1940s in Anglo-American literature<ref name=":2">{{Cite |first=Benno|last=Brinkhaus|first2=Tobias|last2=Esch |chapter=Was ist integrative Medizin? |trans-chapter=What is integrative medicine?|editor-first=Benno|editor-last=Brinkhaus|editor-first2=Tobias|editor-last2=Esch |title=Integrative Medicine and Health |publisher=Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft |location=Berlin |date=2021 |ISBN=978-3-95466-422-1 |pages=9}}</ref> and propagated since the 1990s by, among others, [[Andrew Weil]]<ref name=":1">{{Cite |first=Dieter |last=Melchart |title=From Complementary to Integrative Medicine and Health: Do We Need a Change in Nomenclature? |journal=Complement Med Res |number=25 |publisher=Karger |location=Freiburg |date=2018 |language=en |DOI=10.1159/000488623 |pages=76-78}}</ref>. In the German-speaking world, the term came into use only from the 1990s.<ref name=":2" /> The emphases and interpretations of the still relatively young term changed over the years and are weighted partly differently by different representatives even today. Below are some descriptions and definitions.

In the 2000s, the focus was on a combination of elements of conventional medicine with scientifically evaluated elements of complementary and alternative medicine (see definition NCCAM).<ref name=":2" /> Through the years the concept broadened to include aspects like the relationship between patient and doctor, a network of caretaking persons and in 2020 a democratic environment and a healthy natural environment, bringing the concept close to that of [[One health]] and impulses arising in mainstream medicine.

In the 2000s, the focus was on a combination of elements of conventional medicine with scientifically evaluated elements of complementary and alternative medicine (see definition NCCAM).<ref name=":2" /> Through the years the concept broadened to include aspects like the relationship between patient and doctor, a network of caretaking persons and in 2020 a democratic environment and a healthy natural environment, bringing the concept close to that of [[Wikipedia:One health|One health]] and impulses arising in mainstream medicine.

====Criticism of the concept====

====Criticism of the concept====

There is also criticism of the term, which, apart from its salutogenetic orientation, contains no conceptual innovation over that of [[complementary medicine|complementary medicine]].<ref name=":1" />

There is also criticism of the term, which, apart from its salutogenetic orientation, contains no conceptual innovation over that of [[complementary medicine|complementary medicine]].<ref name=":1" />

|Integrative medicine and Health reaffirms the importance of the relationship between practitioner and patient, focuses on the whole person, is informed by evidence, and makes use of all appropriate therapeutic, preventive, health-promoting, and lifestyle approaches, healthcare professionals and disciplines to achieve optimal health and healing, emphasizing the art and science of healing. It is based on a social and democratic as well as natural and healthy environment.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|title=Neue Definitionen der Integrativen Medizin: Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen?|language=de|url=https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/506224|publisher=Karger|journal=[[Complement Med Res]]|doi=10.1159/000506224|date=2020|volume=27|pages=67–69|last=Esch|first2=Benno|last2=Brinkhaus|first=Tobias|author-link=Tobias Esch|author-link2=Benno Brinkhaus}}</ref>

|Integrative medicine and Health reaffirms the importance of the relationship between practitioner and patient, focuses on the whole person, is informed by evidence, and makes use of all appropriate therapeutic, preventive, health-promoting, and lifestyle approaches, healthcare professionals and disciplines to achieve optimal health and healing, emphasizing the art and science of healing. It is based on a social and democratic as well as natural and healthy environment.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|title=Neue Definitionen der Integrativen Medizin: Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen?|language=de|url=https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/506224|publisher=Karger|journal=[[Complement Med Res]]|doi=10.1159/000506224|date=2020|volume=27|pages=67–69|last=Esch|first2=Benno|last2=Brinkhaus|first=Tobias|author-link=Tobias Esch|author-link2=Benno Brinkhaus}}</ref>

|[[Benno Brinkhaus|Brinkhaus B]], [[Tobias Esch|Esch T]]

|[[Benno Brinkhaus|Brinkhaus B]], [[Tobias Esch|Esch T]]

|}

|}